Friedman refers to play as an active thing that people carry out. This makes sense as playing is something you must actively participate in. However, he goes on to think of situations, other than games, that people might play. I found it interesting how he applied play to watching movies. People typically make a distinction in movie watching versus playing games where in a movie, you passively participate. Friedman pointed out that play is simply a time where we can let our imagination experience a new or different world. This got me thinking back to film theory where we talked about film watching being an active experience, not passive. Most films expect the viewer to participate by actively thinking about the film, connections characters have to things, and where the plot might go next without the film maker explicitly addressing these things.
Friedman also addressed how play can be applied to most everyday life, especially things like social interactions. With his definition of play, anytime we are actively using our imagination, it is a form of play. “Social interactions are performances.” I feel like I have thought of this to a degree before. We sometimes are acting our social interactions versus passively participating in them.
I really enjoy the idea of play being used in almost all aspects of our lives. Being involved with a creative industry, I believe it makes sense to think of using our imagination as play. Before reading this article, I did think watching movies was more of a passive activity, but I believe this idea stems from a person’s physical state when watching a movie. Normally one is not moving around when they are watching a movie. I also like the point Friedman makes that using our imagination is a form of play.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great article, I really love the fact it goes into detail about Friedman’s ideology on “play” great examples that really explained to the viewers his point of view.
LikeLiked by 1 person